The L-series devices, specifically the 元00, are the focus of this article. With this solution, you don’t need to worry about a specialized PCI card, but do need to make sure that the machine you intend to use as a server has enough USB ports to support your intentions. In these kinds of scenarios, nComputing’s U-series access devices are a good fit. U-Series: USB. Many places have machines clustered into pods.Don’t let the fact that the X-series uses Category 5 cabling fool you. This is not an Ethernet-based solution and terminals can’t be any further than 10 meters from the server.
X-Series: Direct. With X-series devices, a specialized PCI card is installed in the machine designated as the server. Individual access terminals are connected to the server with Category 5 cabling. The access devices allow users to connect their own monitor, keyboard and mouse.NComputing has been around since 2003. In the technology world, this is a lifetime. nComputing sells terminals – access devices – that come in three basic flavors: However, when stacked against the challenges above, I have yet to be able to adequately balance everything in a way that makes sense given my organization’s needs. Obviously, there are a lot of benefits to be had with VDI, too. For example, enhanced mobility, different working options and streamlined IT management are just a few of the possibilities. When added to the new licensing costs associated with some VDI solutions, the cost component starts to work against the solution. For example, the least expensive PCoIP terminal I’ve been able to locate is still well above $350. Initial investment. Between the high cost for terminals and high licensing costs for a solution such as VMware View in addition to the supporting infrastructure costs, the VDI solution is significantly more expensive than a traditional environment. On the terminal front, higher cost is associated with multimedia capability.So, it comes down to determining the delta – the difference in the user experience – and the delta level that is acceptable for the organization. Multimedia support is one of the common challenges inherent in terminal-based solutions that don’t do much local graphics processing. I’ve tried a number of options, including PCoIP and Wyse TCX, with very mixed results. However, given the differences between a typical desktop and a VDI replacement solution, such as the fact that the latter is extremely network heavy, it’s not reasonable to assume that the VDI environment will exactly match the desktop one. In a perfect world, a VDI solution would perfectly replicate a traditional desktop environment.
0 kommentar(er)
